Mr.Balaraman, v. Mr.Krishnan,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29.06.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.A.No.1037 of 2007 and MP No.1 of 2007 Balaraman ...

Appellant

Versus

Krishnan ...

Respondent Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam in A.S. No.47 of 2000 dated 29.03.2004 in reversing the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate in O.S. No.353 of 1995 dated 29.09.2000. For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondent : Ms.R. Meenal

JUDGMENT

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today. There is no representation on the side of the appellant, today. Even on the last hearing date i.e., on 16.06.2021, there was no representation on the side of the appellant. However, the learned counsel for the respondent is present. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the appellant is not interested to prosecute this Second Appeal. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsi2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Additional Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam 2.The District Munsif, Vanoor.

Copy to 1.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras-104.

+1cc to Mr.R.Meenal, Advocate (SR No.30529) S.A.No.1037 of 2007 UM (CO) PR (27/07/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/