← Library
Madras High CourtWP/3086/2026disposed of

Elumalai v. The State Rep By

2026-02-04Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Elumalai ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The State Rep By The District Collector, O/o. The District Collector Office, Tiruvannamalai District .

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer O/o. Revenue Divisional Office, Tiruvannamalai District.

3. The Tahsildar Thandarampattu Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.

4. Govindan

5. Subramani

6. Venkatesan

7. Manjula

8. Varalakshmi

9. Jayalakshmi 10.Sathish Kumar ..Respondent(s) directing the 3rd Respondent to take action pursuant to the representation dated 17.10.2024 based on the communication issued by the 1st Respondents dated 25.10.2024.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.R.Thirumoorthy For Respondent(s):

Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For R1 to R3 R4 to R10-N D/w-PVT Order This writ petition has been filed seeking to remove the alleged wrong entry made in the subject patta No.2717.

2.The petitioner had given a representation to the third respondent on 17.10.2024 seeking for removal of the alleged wrong entry made in patta No.2717. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. The petitioner also claims that a communication was sent

by the first respondent on 25.10.2024 to the petitioner based on the petitioner's representation dated 17.10.2024. But till date, no final order has been passed by the third respondent.

3.Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse order is being passed against the respondents 4 to 10, notice to the respondents 4 to 10 is dispensed with. 4.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.

5.No prejudice would be caused to the official respondents if the petitioner's representation dated 17.10.2024, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of the respondents 4 to 10 and by adhering to the principles of natural justice, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 17.10.2024 seeking for removal of the alleged wrong entry made in patta No.2717 for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections of the

respondents 4 to 10 or any other third party whom the second respondent deems

ABDUL QUDDHOSE J.

VGA it fit to enquire, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

04-02-2026 VGA To

1. The State Rep By The District Collector, O/o. The District Collector Office, Tiruvannamalai District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer O/o. Revenue Divisional Office, Tiruvannamalai District.

3. The Tahsildar Thandarampattu Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.