Abishek v. The State Rep By Its
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.2366 of 2022 Abishek
...Petitioner
Vs.
The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Government Railway Police Station.
(Crime No.129 of 2021) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police concerned in crime No.129 of 2021, on the file of the respondent Police.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Santhaseelan For Respondent : Mr.N.S.Sugunthan Government Advocate (Crl.side)
ORDER
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences under Sections 174 of Cr.P.C., @ 294(b), 323, r/w 306 of IPC, in Crime No.129 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused had teased and abused the deceased using filthy language. It is further alleged that they had attacked the deceased with beer bottle and due to their inducement, the deceased committed suicide by falling before the running train and thereby the deceased lost his life. Hence, the law enforcing agency registered a case against the petitioner.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a college student and he is pursuing B.com and further he is no way connected with the occurrence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the co-accused anticipatory bail application was dismissed by this Court in Crl.O.P.Nos.403 and 463 of 2022, dated 10.01.2022 and 11.01.2022. He further submitted that the investigation is almost completed. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the submissions made by both counsel and the investigation is almost completed, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thiruvallur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: (a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required for an interrogation; (c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions has been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
-sd/- 02/02/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-II, THIRUVALLUR.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT RAILWAY POLICE STATION, THIRUVALLUR.
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1CC to M/S.R.SAMPATH KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.1700 CRL OP.2366/2022 Date :02/02/2022 CSK 09/02/2022