S.S.Panneer Selvam v. S/T.N. Rep By Secy To Govt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.06.2019 CORAM :

The Hon'ble Mrs.VIJAYA K.TAHILRAMANI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P. Nos.44255 and 44256 of 2002 S.S.Panneer Selvam, Chairman, Villupuram Municipality, .. Petitioner in both WPs -vs1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Ezhilagam Annex, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

3.Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Vellore-12.

4.The District Collector, 5.The Commissioner, Villupuram Municipality, 6.M.C.Sampath Minister for Local Administration, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

7.P.Mohan, Minister for Food, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

8.Mohammed Aslam IAS, District Collector, 9.A.Noor Mohammed, Vice Chairman, Villupuram Municipality, Villupuram.

.. Respondents W.P.No.44255 of 2002 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent in Letter No.45444/ eep 5/2002-1 dated 29.11.2002 and quash the same.

W.P.No.44256 of 2002 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent in Letter No.45444/ eep 5/2002-2 dated 29.11.2002 and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Jayasingh For Respondents : Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4 Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan Government Pleader (i/c) for respondent No.5 Respondent Nos.6 and 7 - Not Ready in notice No Appearance for respondent Nos.8 and 9 COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard Mr.D.Jayasingh, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy, learned Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan, learned Government Pleader (i/c) for respondent No.5.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petitions have become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to the said effect.

3. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar bbr To 1.The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Ezhilagam Annex, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

3.Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Vellore-12.

4.The District Collector, W.P.Nos.44255 and 44256 of 2002 SS(CO) RRS(16/07/2019)