← Library
Madras High CourtWP/45543/2002dismissed

Dr.Ambedkar Hut Dwellers v. Special Commissioner And

2019-11-12Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh,Honourable Mr Justice Rmt. Teekaa Raman3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.11.2019 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN W.P. No. 45543 of 2002 and W.M.P.No.66486 of 2002 Dr.Ambedkar Hut Dwellers Welfare Association rep. by its Secretary P.Rajasekaran ... Petitioner -vs1.Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Reforms, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

2.State of Tamil Nadu rep. by Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

3.The Tamil Nadu Land Reforms Special Appellate Tribunal rep. by Registrar, Santhome, Chennai - 4.

... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent herein pertaining to Order No.Mu.Mu 16420/00 dated 04.12.2000 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to complete the formalities for the allotment of the lands comprised in Survey Nos.48/3B, 51/IA5, 51/IA1C, 54/IB and 55/1 in Seevaram village and Survey Nos.223/4B, 226/13-A, 53/10 and 53/11 in Perungudi village in Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District in favour of the petitioner Association.

For Petitioner : Mr.Srinath Sridevan For Respondents :

Mr.Akil Akbar Ali, Govt. Advocate for R1 & R2 R3 - Tribunal

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.] Challenging the order of the first respondent dated 04.12.2000 and for a consequential direction to the respondents to complete the formalities for the allotment of the lands comprised in Survey Nos.18/3B, 51/IA5, 51/IA1C, 54/IB and 55/1 in Seevaram village and Survey Nos.223/4B, 226/13-A, 53/10 and 53/11 in Perungudi village in Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District in favour of the petitioner Association, the present writ petition has been filed.

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner reports no instructions. In view of the fact that the matter is pending for about 17 years, we are not inclined to keep this writ petition pending any longer. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to file appropriate petition, if so advised. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mmi/ssm To 1.The Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Reforms, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

2.The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

3.The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Land Reforms Special Appellate Tribunal, Chennai - 4.

W.P. No. 45543 of 2002 bp(co) nr 19/12/2019