K.A.Mumtaz Begum v. The Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.06.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.45572 of 2002 K.A.Mumtaz Begum ...Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Rippon Buildings Chennai-3 2.The District Collector Chennai 3.Arulmigu Agatheeswara Prasanna Venkateswara Perumal Devasthanam rep. by its Executive Officer Nungambakkam, Chennai-34 ... Respondents Prayer: The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of CERTIORARI, calling for the records pertaining to the notice dt.15.12.2002 issued under Section 220 and 222 of Madras City Municipal Corporation Act issued by the 1st respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Amarnath For Respondents : Mr.L.A.Ravidran for R1 Mr.J.Ramesh, AGP for R2 Mr.G.Sugumaran for R3

O R D E R

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle.

2.In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also in view of the endorsement made, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition if any is closed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kas To 1.The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Rippon Buildings Chennai-3 2.The District Collector Chennai.

+1cc to Mr.G.Sugumaran, Advocate, S.R.No.53251 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.54013 W.P.No.45572 of 2002 RGN(CO) RRS(06/08/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/