Madras High CourtCRL OP/22359/2016dismissed as infructuous

K.Kalavathi, (Age 34) v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-11-03Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.11.2022

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR and Crl.M.P.No.10401 of 2016 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 In Crl.O.P.No.22359 of 2016 1.K.Kalavathi 2.K.Tamilarasi ... Petitioners/A1 & A2

Versus

1.The Inspector of Police, Mallur Police Station, Salem District.

2.B.Kannan ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records relating in C.C.No.89 of 2014 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Salem and to quash the same by allowing this Criminal Original Petition.

For Petitioners : Mr.K.Karthikeyan For Respondent-1 : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For Respondent-2 : Mr.A.K.Kumarasamy Page No.1 of 4

In Crl.O.P.No.2067 of 2015 1.Kannan 2.Anbukkarasu 3.Dhanabakkiam 4.Pappayammal ... Petitioners/A1 to A4

Versus

State rep. by Inspector of Police, Mallur Police Station, (Crime No.316/2013) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in C.C.No.181 of 2013 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Salem and to quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.A.K.Kumarasamy For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side) COMMON ORDER These petitions have been filed to quash the complaint against the petitioners/Accused 1 & 2 in C.C.No.89 of 2014 and petitioners/Accused 1 to 4 in C.C.No.81 of 2014, pending on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Salem.

Page No.2 of 4

2. The petitioners in Crl.O.P.No.22359 of 2016 are the accused in Charge Sheet No.180 of 2013. Similarly, the petitioners in Crl.O.P.No.2067 of 2015 are the accused in Charge Sheet No.181 of 2013.

3. It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate that both Charge Sheet Nos.180 and 181 of 2013 were taken on file in C.C.Nos.89 and 81 of 2014, respectively on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI,

4. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the de-facto complainant that both C.C.Nos.89 and 81 of 2014 ended in acquittal. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication in these cases.

5. Recording the above said submissions, these Criminal Original Petitions are dismissed as infructuous.

03.11.2022 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No rsi Page No.3 of 4

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

rsi To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.VI, 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

and Crl.M.P.No.10401 of 2016 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 03.11.2022 Page No.4 of 4