Premanath, Aged 23 Years, v. The State Rep. By,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 01.06.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Crl.O.P.No.8261 of 2017 Premnath ..

Petitioner Vs

1. State rep.by The Superintendent of Police, Kancheepuram District

2. The Inspector of Police, Uthiramerur Police Station, Kancheepuram District ..

Respondents Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry.

For Petitioner : Mr.G. Magesh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias, Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that without having any rhyme or reasons the petitioner is directed by the second respondent police to appear before them and there is no offence committed by the petitioner.

2.

On the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor stoutly refuted the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that the petitioner himself is an accused and his presence is required for conducting an enquiry.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.

To give quietus, the petitioner is directed to appear before the second respondent police on 12.06.2017, on which date, the respondent police shall conduct the enquiry. With the above direction, the criminal original petition is disposed of. -s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar sr To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Kancheepuram District

2. The Inspector of Police, Uthiramerur Police Station, Kancheepuram District 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai-600 104. +1cc to Mr.G.Magesh Kumar, Advocate in Sr.No.39378 Crl.O.P.No.8261 4of 2017 NR(09/06/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/