Suresh Jain @ Suresh Kumar v. The Commissioner Of Police
Crl.OP.No.1353 of 2023 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 201 and 411 of IPC & under Sections 66, 66C, 66D, 71 of IT Act in crime No. 166 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the license amount was not refunded to the defacto complainant by the trading companies.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioner was implicated for the offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 201 and 411 of IPC & under Sections 66, 66C, 66D, 71 of IT Act, on the file of the The Assistant Commissioner of Police, IFSO, Special Cell, IFSO Building, Sector - 16C, Dwarka, New Delhi. Further, he contended that the petitioner is innocent person no way connected with this case. Hence, he prayed for interstate anticipatory bail.
4. Notice issued to the respondents.
1/3
5. Heard the learned Government Advocate Criminal side.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant inter-state interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner for a period of four weeks from today to enable him to move the concerned Court.
7. Accordingly, interim interstate anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner for a period of four weeks, on condition that the petitioner shall surrender before the learned VII Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready and the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Magistrate. Further, within four weeks from the date of execution of bail bond, the petitioner shall approach the competent Court in New Delhi and seek appropriate relief. 24.01.2023 pbl 2/3
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
pbl Crl.O.P.No. 1353 of 2023 24.01.2023 3/3