← Library
Madras High CourtWP/13671/2013closed

A.Raja v. The State Of Tamilnadu,

2026-03-26Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar10 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.03.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and M.P.No.1 of 2013

1. A.Raja

2. K.Kalaivani

3. K.Deebalakshmi

4. S.Saraswathi

5. S.Umashankari

6. G.Mathammal

7. K.Tamil Selvan

8. R.Kannan

9. R.Anbarasi

10. M.Matheenabegam

11. V.Kalaivani

12. M.Kathiravan

13. B.Arivazhagan 1/10

14. S.Kolanjiyappa

15. A.M.Ramesh

16. K.Parkavidevi

17. S.Karpagam

18. M.Surendharan

19. V.Sheela

20. R.Rajarajeswari

21. T.Dhanapal

22. V.Govindasamy

23. S.G.Nithyakalyani

24. C.Alagarsamy

25. Angappan.S

26. B.Saravana Kumar

27. S.Ashok

28. S.Matheena Begum

29. N.Ravidran

30. R.Saravana Priya

31. J.Kalyana Sundaram

32. K.Velsamy 2/10

33. S.Rajkumar

34. S.Rajakumari

35. Santhakumar.P.

36. M.Kanimozhi

37. M.Mathialagi

38. S.Saravanan

39. R.Pachaiyappan

40. A.Palani

41. Kumar.T

42. Latha.N

43. Murugan.T

44. Muthamil Selvi.N

45. R.Nagarajan

46. Rajammal.R.

47. M.Rajagopal

48. M.Ramesh

49. Ramesh T.E

50. Senthil.G.M

51. J.Sridhar 3/10

52. Subha.J

53. Subhalakshmi.V

54. V.Nambirajan

55. Vasanthi.K.K

56. Vijaya.P

57. Visalatchi.U

58. A.Subhashini

59. P.Anitha

60. V.Karthikeyan

61. V.Gomathi

62. V.Vijayamohan

63. S.Selvaraju

64. K.Sakthivel

65. A.M.Ashara Basha

66. S.Manikandan

67. K.Sankari

68. A.Deivanayagi

69. P.Senthilkumar

70. J.Amsaveni 4/10

71. T.Chithra

72. S.Subashini

73. C.V.Parimala

74. A.V.Umamaheswari

75. G.Jeyalakshmi

76. A.Riswana Barveen

77. M.Kanmani

78. K.Arundhadhi

79. N.Vasantharaju

80. G.Jambulingam

81. Y.Sulaikha

82. M.Arulkumar 83.A.Anisha Christy

84. M.Vijayalakshmi

85. K.M.Velmurugan

86. D.Meganathan

87. Kalaimathi M

88. S.Suresh

89. M.Mohamed Sardar 5/10

90. V.Karunakaran

91. Venkatesan.P.

92. G.Prakash

93. Prakash. M

94. V.Murugan

95. S.Rajasekharan

96. M.Shanmugam

97. K.Martin

98. S.Mohamed Zaheer

99. K.Ramesh

100. T.Ganesan

101. P.Bhaskar

102. S.Rajan Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Arni, TV Malai Dt.

103. P.Ammunulla Government Higher Secondary School, Vandipalayam, Cuddalore Dt.

104. M.Sampath Government Higher Secondary School, Minnal, Vellore Dt.

105. V.Thangam Government Higher Secondary School(Girls), 6/10

Vandavasi.

106. Revathi Government Higher Secondary School (Boys) Vandavasi, TV Malai Dt.

107. Kayavizhi Government Higher Secondary School, Akoor, TV Malai Dt.

108. Sridevi Government Higher Secondary School, Nampedu, TV Malai Dt.

109. Victoria Mary, Government Higher Secondary School, Periyampatti, Dharmapuri.

110. K.Baskaran Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Pochampalli, Dharmapuri.

111. V.Nirmala Government Higher Secondary School, Velagounder Patti, Namakkal.

112. M.Rajamani Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Namakkal.

113. D.Rajkumar Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Erumapatti, Namakkal Dt.

114. K.Shanthi Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Attamyampatti, Salem.

7/10

115. V.Nallmmal, Government Higher Secondary School, Mangalapuram, Namakkal.

116. S.Jayanthi Government Higher Secondary School, Thumbal, Salem Dt.

All are working as Computer Instructors, Government Higher Secondary Schools, Under the second respondent herein.

... Petitioners vs

1. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary Education Department, Chennai - 600 009.

2. Director of School Education, Directorate of School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai - 600 006.

3. Joint Director of School Education (Vocational), Directorate of School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai - 600 006.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to regularize petitioners services as Computer Instructors with all consequential monetary and service benefits and pass orders.

For Petitioners : Mr.N.Surya Senthil For Respondents : Mrs.P.Rajarajeswari Government Advocate 8/10

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioners appearing through video conferencing submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and thus, the writ petition has become infructuous.

2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. Since, the counsel for the petitioners appeared through V.C, the endorsement to be made on the bundle is dispensed with. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

26.03.2026 (2/2) Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No : Yes / No dh To

1. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary Education Department, Chennai - 600 009.

2. Director of School Education, Directorate of School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai - 600 006.

3. Joint Director of School Education (Vocational), Directorate of School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai - 600 006.

9/10

T. VINOD KUMAR , J.

dh 26.03.2026 (2/2) 10/10