Rajendiran v. The State Rep. By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.01.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Rajendiran ... Petitioner Vs.
The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Thanipadi Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.
Crime No.08 of 2024 ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., prayed to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.08 of 2024 on the file of the respondent Police.
For Petitioner : Mr.E.Sathiyaraj For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (crl.side)
ORDER
The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 05.01.2024 for the offences registered under Sections 4(1)(a) r/w 4(1A)(ii) of TNP Act in Crime No.08 of 2024 on the file of the respondent 1/4
Police, seeks bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 20 litres of ID Arrack. 3.It is stated by the learned Government Advocate that there are 17 previous cases against the petitioner, out of which, 15 cases have been disposed of and one case is under investigation. 4.Taking all the factors into consideration and the period of incarceration, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:
5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thandrampattu, Tiruvannamalai District and on further conditions that:- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b]the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
2/4
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
22.01.2024 vkr To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thandrampattu, Tiruvannamalai District. 2.The Sub Jail, Tiruvannamalai.
3.The Inspector of Police, Thanipadi Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.
4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.
3/4
vkr 22.01.2024 4/4