← Library
Madras High CourtWP/2259/2023disposed of

J.M.Samimudeen v. The District Collector

2026-03-27Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and WMP No. 2338 of 2023 J.M.Samimudeen ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The District Collector, Collector office, Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram District.

2. The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Kanchipuram.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Kanchipuram.

4. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram District.

5. The President, Serbanacheri Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 4th respondent not to vacate the petitioner from his cultivating land comprised in Gramanatham survey No.33/1 to the extent of 15762.50 sq.fts situated at Serpanacheri Village,

Sriperumbudur Taluk in Kanchipuram District based on the petitioner's representation dated 14.12.2022 in order to make way for the 5th respondent to illegally occupy the petitioner's cultivating land. For Petitioner(s) :

Mr.K.L.Sekar For Respondent(s) :

Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP

ORDER

This writ petition is filed to direct the fourth respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.12.2022.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 14.12.2022 not to vacate from his cultivating land comprised in gramanatham Survey No.33/1 to the extent of 15762.50 sq.ft., situated at Serpanacheri Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kanchipuram District. However, the said representation was not considered by the respondents, as on date. Hence, this writ petition.

3. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner's representation will be considered by the fourth respondent within a period of twelve weeks.

4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the first respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 14.12.2022, after issuing due notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as aggrieved parties, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 27-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VM

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J.

VM To:

1. The District Collector, Collector office, Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram District.

2. The District Revenue officer, District Revenue office, Kanchipuram.

3. The Revenue Divisional officer, Revenue Divisional office, Kanchipuram.

4. The Tahsildar, Taluk office, Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram District.

5. The President, Serbanacheri Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

27-03-2026