Arumugam v. The State Rep.By, The Sub Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05-12-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL MP Nos. 6617 & 6619 of 2025 AND CRL OP NOs. 13174 and 13172 of 2020 Arumugam Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The State Rep.By, The Sub Inspector Of Police, Mangalam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District - 606 752.
2.Ramadoss Respondent(s) CRL MP No. 6619 of 2025 Arumugam Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The State Rep.By, The Sub Inspector Of Police, Mangalam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District - 606 752.
2.Shankar Common Prayer: These Petitions filed under Section 483(3) of BNSS, 2023,
seeking to cancel the bail granted to the 2nd respondents in Crl OP Nos.13174 & 13172 of 2020 dated 28.08.2020.
Respondent(s) CRL MP No. 6617 & 6619 of 2025 For Petitioner(s):
S.Sridevi S.Dhanalakshmi N. Kirupa Addl Typed Set Filed Affidavit Of Service Filed For Respondent(s):
Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate Crl side For R1 Mr.S.K.Mageshwaran for R2 Court Notice Served For R2 R-2 Ramadoss S/o. Murugesan, Santhu Kinaru Street, Vedanthaadi Village And Post, Kilpenathur Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.
Private Notice Permitted - Proof Filed - Served For R2 COMMON ORDER These petitions have been filed by the petitioner, seeking cancellation of bail granted to the 2nd respondents by this Court in CRL OP Nos. 13174 & 13172 of 2020 dated 28.08.2020 respectively.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this petitioner is one of the victims in another case and further the 2nd respondents is habitually involved in committing various offences against where the petitioner is residing hence unable to bear the continuous harassment in the hands of the 2nd respondent, the petitioner herein has come forward with the present petition.
Since the order passed by this Court is of the year 2020 this Court has verified the stage of the case and it was reported that the case is pending for examination of investigating officer. Accordingly, this Court has adjourned the matter with a direction to complete the examination of the investigation officer. 3.When the matter is called today, it is reported that the investigation officer was examined. However, the 2nd respondent/bail petitioner has obtained time for cross examination of the investigation officer. 4.Considering the above submissions, I am of the view that since there is every likelihood of completion of the trial and the cancellation of bail at this stage is not necessary.
5.Accordingly this Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed. 05-12-2025 GBI Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes
To 1.The State Rep.By, The Sub Inspector Of Police, Mangalam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District - 606 752.
2.Ramadoss S/o. Murugesan, Santhu Kinaru Street, Vedanthaadi Village And Post, Kilpenathur Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.
3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
CRL OP No. 13174 of 2020 To 1.State Represented By Sub Inspector Of Police, Mangalam Police Station , Tiruvannamalai District.
CRL OP No. 13172 of 2020 To 1.State Represented By Sub Inspector Of Police, Mangalam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.
CRL MP No. 6619 of 2025 To 1.The State Rep.By, The Sub Inspector Of Police, Mangalam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District - 606 752.
2.Shankar
S/o. Murugesan, Santhu Kinaru Street, Vedanthaadi Village And Post, Kilpenathur Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.
K.RAJASEKAR J.
gbi CRL MP No. 6617 of AND CRL OP NO.
13174 OF 2020,CRL OP NO. 13172 OF 2020,CRL MP NO. 6619 OF 2025 05-12-2025