Madras High CourtWP/7139/2014dismissed for nonprosecution

M.Ettiappan v. Revenue Secretary

2018-06-22Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :22.06.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.7139 & 7140 of 2014 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2014 W.P.No.7139 of 2014 M.Ettiappan Deputy Collector, Formerly Revenue Divisional Officer, Tambaram, Residing at:

No.4/94, Mettu Street, 1st Lane, Sathuma Nagar, Thiruvottiyur Chennai - 600 019.

..Petitioner vs Revenue Department, St.George Fort,

2. The District Collector,

3. The District Revenue Officer,

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

5. The Tahsildar, Solinganallur.

6. The Tahsildar, Alandur.

.. Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 1st respondent pertaining to G.O.(2D) No.134, Revenue(Ser2(2)1Department dated 14.02.2014 and quash the said G.O., consequently direct the 1st respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with backwages and other attendant benefits.

For Petitioners :

Mr.R.Krishnasamy(No appearance) For Respondents :

Mr.M.Elumalai, GA W.P.No.7140 of 2014 M.Punithavathi ..Petitioner vs Revenue Department, Secretariat, St.George Fort,

2. District Collector,

3. District Revenue Officer,

4. Revenue Divisional Officer,

5. Tahsildar, Solinganallur, Chennai.

.. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 1st respondent pertaining to G.O.(2D) No.135, Revenue(Ser2(2)1Department dated 14.02.2014 and quash the said G.O., consequently direct the 1st respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with backwages and other attendant benefits.

For Petitioners :

Mr.R.Krishnasamy(No appearance) For Respondents :

Mr.M.Elumalai, GA

C O M M O N O R D E R The matters were listed for hearing on 21.06.2018 under the caption "for dismissal" in respect of the Miscellaneous Petitions, there was no representation on behalf of the writ petitioners. Thus, once again the writ petitions itself are posted for hearing today (i.e.22.06.2018) under the caption "for dismissal". But, even today, none represented on behalf of the petitioners.

2.Thus, the writ petitions stand dismissed for Nonprosecution. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kak To Revenue Department, St.George Fort,