← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/1193/2021dismissed

R.Selvakumar v. State Rep. By

2021-02-12Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 12.02.2021 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN CRL.OP.No.1193 of 2021 R.Selvakumar ... Petitioner Vs.

State, rep. By ... Respondent Sub Inspector of Police, F-4 Kavarapettai Police Station, Tiruvallur District.

(Crime No.1741 of 2020) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.1741 of 2020 on the file of respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.A.E.Lakshmi Narayanan For Respondent : Mr.S.Karthikeyan Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 379, 430 IPC, 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.1741 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had transported six units of silica sand illegally by using a vehicle, without any valid licence. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he is no way connected with the alleged offence and has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the quantity of silica sand involved is six https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

units. He further submitted that there is one previous case pending against the petitioner. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also the submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that he has one previous case to his credit, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

-sd/- 12/02/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 STATE REP. BY SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, F-4 KAVARAPETTAI POLICE STATION, TIRUVALLUR DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S. A.E.LAKSHMI NARAYANAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.1193/2021 Date :12/02/2021 EP-03/03/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/