Janakiraman v. The State Rep.By Its, The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Janakiraman ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep.by its, The Inspector of Police, Thirumudivakkam Police Station, Kancheepuram District.

(Cr.No.Not Known /2025) ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of her arrest in the above Crime No. Not Known of 2025 on the file of Thirumudivakkam Police Station, Kancheepuram District.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.D.Magesh For Respondent(s):

Ms.J.R.Archana, GA (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS (147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324, 506 of

IPC) in connection with the Cr.No.Not Known of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The allegations against the petitioner are that the defacto complainant paid an advance of Rs.1,00,000/- to the petitioner in connection with a proposed sale of petitioner's property. Subsequently, when the defacto complainant sought return of the said amount, the petitioner picked up a quarrel and assaulted him, resulting in injuries, for which the defacto complainant was admitted in the hospital. Hence, the present complaint.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person, and he has been falsely implicated in this case by the respondent police. He further submit that the petitioner is ready to sell his property to the defacto complainant, but the defacto complainant was not ready to purchase the petitioner's property and prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution's case and on instructions, submitted that the investigation in this case is still pending and opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the nature of allegations, the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side, injured discharged, petitioner is not having any previous cases, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am., for a period two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

[c] the petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.2023.

02-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order JAI To

1. The Inspector of Police, Thirumudivakkam Police Station, Kancheepuram District.

2. The Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

JAI 02-02-2026