← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/1147/2025granted

Lakshmi v. The Inspector Of Police

2025-01-17Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 17.01.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Lakshmi ... Petitioner Vs State rep by The Inspector of Police, Mahendramangalam police station,.

Dharmapuri District (Crime No.145 of 2024) ... Respondent PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha, 2023 praying to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of her arrest by the respondent police in Crime No. 145 of 2024 pending on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr..J.Pradeep For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No. 145 of 2024 , on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

1/5

2.

The case of the prosecution is that while defacto complainant doing his agricultural activity at Seengeri village, he came to know that his three goats were found missing in the cattle farm. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and she has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and she has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the goats have been recovered. He would also submit that no previous case is pending against the petitioner. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.

Considering the representations made by both sides and considering the nature of offences charged against the petitioner and considering that no previous case is pending against the petitioner, this 2/5

Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Palacode, Dharmapuri District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 A.M. until further orders. [b] the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts of the Court or to any police officer.

3/5

[c] the petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall make himself/herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

17.01.2025 nr 4/5

G.R.SWAMINATHAN J.

nr 17.01.2025 5/5