Muthusamy v. Govindammal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.11.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.A. No.430 of 2008 and M.P. No.1 of 2008 Muthusamy ...Appellant/Appellant/Plaintiff Vs

1. Govindammal

2. Vijaya

3. Kanagam ....

Respondents /Respondent/Defendants Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure as against the Judgment and decree dated 31.03.2003 passed in A.S. No.104 of 2002 on the file of the 1st Additional District and Sessions Court, Salem in confirming the judgment and decree dated 19.12.2001 passed in O.S. No.92 of 1999 on the file of the Sub Court, Mettur.

For appellant : Mr.P.Mani For respondents : No appearance

JUDGMENT

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that he is unable to trace the bundle. Even on the last occasion i.e. on 08.11.2019, when the matter was listed under the caption "for dismissal", only at the request of the learned counsel for the appellant, the matter was adjourned today. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the Second Appeal. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsi2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Salem.

2. The Sub Judge, Mettur.

3. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.

S.A. No.430 of 2008 BR(CO) GN(13/12/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/