Anbukarasi v. Manimekalai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.03.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN S.A.Nos.442 to 445 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.1, 1, 1 and 1 of 2008 Anbukarasi ...Defendant/Appellant/Appellant in S.A.Nos.442 & 443 of 2008 E.Andavar ...Defendant/Appellant/Appellant in S.A.Nos.444 & 445 of 2008 Vs.

Manimekalai ...Plaintiff/Respondent/Respondent in S.A.Nos.442 & 445 of 2008 Rajendran ...Plaintiff/Respondent/Respondent in S.A.Nos.443 & 444 of 2008 Common Prayer:- Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree of the learned Fast Track Judge of Chidambaram dated 30.07.2007 passed in A.S.Nos.2, 3, 4 and 5 of 2006 dismissing the appeal confirming the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge of Chidambaram in O.S.No.134 of 1999, O.S.Nos.28, 29 and 30 of 2000 dated 04.09.2003.

1 Page of 4

For Appellant in all appeals :

Mr.M.D.Nazrullah For Respondent in all appeals :

M/s.Sheeba Priyadarshini COMMON JUDGMENT These appeals arise out of a suit for recovery of money. Mr.M.D.Nazarullah representing Mr.R.Gururaj, learned counsel for the appellant and M/s.Sheeba Priyadarshini representing Mr.T.K.Bhaskar, learned counsel for the respondent are present. 2.Mr.M.D.Nazarullah has filed a Memo in all four appeals and has settled the matter with the respondent. He has filed a Memo to that effect and learned counsel for the respondent has also made an endorsement. 3.Recording the same, these appeals are dismissed as settled out of Court. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

10.03.2023 cda Index: Yes / No 2 Page of 4

To 1.The Fast Track Judge of Chidambaram.

2.The Subordinate Judge of Chidambaram.

3.The Section Officer, VR Records, High Court, Chennai.

V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J., 3 Page of 4

cda S.A.Nos.442 to 445 of 2008 10.03.2023 4 Page of 4