← Library
Madras High CourtWP/6139/2014dismissed as infructuous

R.Priya, Minor v. The General Manager

2016-03-10Honourable Mr Justice R.Subbiah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.03.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH W.P.No.6139 of 2014 R.Priya, Minor, rep. By her father T.Rajendran .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The General Manager, Indian Bank, Chennai

2. The Branch Manager, Indian Bank, Gandhi Road, Mannargudi, Mannargudi Taluk, Thiruvarur District .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order of rejection of Education loan passed by the 2nd respondent dated 27.11.2013 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to sanction the education loan amount of Rs.1,87,375/- for the completion of Diploma in Computer Engineering Course of the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Ms.S.Meenakshi for M/s K.Muthuramalingam For Respondents: Mr.M.V.Chandran for R1

O R D E R

With the consent of both sides, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal.

2. This Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order of rejection of Education loan passed by the 2nd respondent dated 27.11.2013 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to sanction the education loan amount of Rs.1,87,375/- for the completion of the Diploma in Computer Engineering Course of the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. When the matter is taken up for consideration, it is represented by the counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has completed the course in the year 2014 itself. He would further contend that for completion of the course, she borrowed loan from outsiders, thus he submitted that the prayer has to be considered.

4. In my considered view when the petitioner has already completed the course, the prayer in the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Therefore, the question of allowing the prayer in the Writ Petition does not arise at this stage. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS VII ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar ssd To 1.The General Manager, Indian Bank, Chennai

2. The Branch Manager, Indian Bank, Gandhi Road, Mannargudi, Mannargudi Taluk, Thiruvarur District W.P.No.6139 of 2014 SVI (CO) kk 28/3 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/