Thamilarasan v. The State Rep By Its,
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 4(1)(aaa) r/w 4(1-A) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Transport) Act, 1937 in Cr.No.196 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused was found in illegal transportation of 110 litres of pondy arrack. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. However, on instructions, the learned counsel further submits that the petitioner, on his own volition, is ready and willing to contribute some amount for charitable purpose that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner along with other accused was found in illegal transportation of 110 litres of pondy arrack for selling. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Mayiladuthurai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of
Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), to the credit of the Registered Advocate Clerk Association, Mayiladuthurai as a non refundable deposit, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below.
[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[c] the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent police on every Wednesday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of six weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
Jai [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
jai 25.01.2023 Crl.O.P.No.1463 of 2023