N. Jagadeeshkumar No 77 v. Chandran S/O Of Veeraragahava

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14.09.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA S.A.No. 1226 of 2009 Narayanasamy(deceased) 1.N.Jagadeesh Kumar 2.N.Jai Ramesh 3.N.Lokesh ...Appellants/Plaintiffs R6 of Appellant (Cause title of the appellants accepted vide C.M.P.No.3720 of 2000 by SSSJ dated 23.03.2000) ..Vs..

1.Chandran 2.Srinivasan (Died) 3.Unnamalai 4.Murugan 5.Manjula

...Respondents/Defendants

(RR3 to 5 brought on record as legal representatives of the deceased 2nd respondent vide order of Court dated 09.03.2009 made in C.M.P.Nos.61 to 63 of 2008) PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 02.03.1999 in A.S.No.91 of 1998 on the file of Principal District Court, Krishnagiri, confirming the decree and judgment dated 31.07.1998 in O.S.No.8 of 1991 on the file of District Munsif, Krishnagiri. For Appellants : No appearance

JUDGMENT

When the second appeal came up for hearing on 27.07.2021, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants reported no instructions from the appellants and hence the Registry was https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

directed to issue notice to the appellants and list the matter by printing the name of the appellants after serving notice on them.

2.Though the name of the appellants are printed in the cause list today after issuing notice to the appellants, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants.

3. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mtl To

1. The Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri.

2. The District Munsif, Krishnagiri.

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

S.A.No.1226 of 2009 MG[co] NSK 20/10/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/