Krishnamurthi v. Kulsum Fathima

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.03.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA S.A.No.350 of 2007 and M.P. Nos.1 & 2 of 2007 Krishnamurthi ...Appellant/Defendant Vs.

Kulsum Fathima

...Respondent/Plaintiff

Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC, 1908 against the decree and judgment dated 20.01.2006 passed in A.S. No.19 of 2005, on the file of the District Judge, Cuddalore, upholding the decree and judgment dated 11.01.2005 passed in O.S. No.153 of 1999, on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Panruti.

For Appellant : Mr. S. Kingston Jerold For Respondent : Mr.V. Lakshminarayanan

JUDGMENT

A Compromise Memo dated 01.01.2022 has been filed in the present appeal signed by both the appellant and the respondent and their respective counsels. The same is hereby recorded.

2. In view of the above, the second appeal is disposed of as per the terms of Compromise Memo recorded. The Compromise Memo shall form part of the decree in this second appeal. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

bga To

1. The District Judge, Cuddalore.

2. The Subordinate Judge, Panruti.

Copy to The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

+1 CC to Mr.N.Manokaran, Advocate sr 17134 +1 CC to Mr.S.Kingston Jerold, Advocate sr 17379. S.A.No.350 of 2007 PA(CO) SP(08/06/2022) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/