Kannammal, v. Tahsildar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 05.04.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA S.A.No.1063 of 2006 1.Kannammal 2.Subramanian ...Appellants Vs.

1.Tahsildar Egmore - Nungambakkam.

2.Kannian 3.Kasi 4.Elumalai 5.Kantha 6.Ponnammal

...Respondents

Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Civil Procedure against the decree and judgment dated 26.07.2005 in A.S.No.185 of 2004 on the file of the II Fast Track Court, Chennai, upholding against the decree and judgment dated 21.12.2001 in O.S.No.15219 of 1996 on the file of the IV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.

For Appellants :

Mr.S.Narasimhulu For R1 :

Dr.S.Suriya, Additional Government Pleader RR2 to 4 : NA

JUDGMENT

A perusal of the records shows that the respondents 2 to 6 died long back and till date no steps have been taken by the appellants to implead the legal heirs of the deceased respondents.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.In view of the above, the Second Appeal stands abated. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mtl To 1.

The Judge, II Fast Track Court, Chennai.

2.

The Judge, IV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.

3.

The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to the Special Government Pleader, S.R.No.24187 [09/06/2022] S.A.No.1063 of 2006 SKM(CO) A.SK(19/04/2022) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/