S.Kuppusamy v. Nataraj

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 30.09.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM S.A.No.1259 of 2003 S.Kuppusamy ... Appellant/ Defendant Vs.

Nataraj ... Respondent/Plaintiff PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 21.11.2002 passed in A.S.No.63 of 2001 on the file of the Subordinate Judge Court, Udumalpet, reversing the well considered judgment and decree dated 09.10.2001 made in O.S.No.395 of 1997 dated , on the file of the District Munsif Court, Udumalpet.

For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.S.Gunalan

JUDGMENT

No representation for the appellant. The learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the appellant died one year ago. But, so far steps not taken. Today (30.09.2019), posted for taking steps to implead the LRs of the sole appellant as no further adjournment.

2. It appears that so far no LR petition has been filed to implead the LRs of the sole appellant. Hence, appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vv https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The Subordinate Judge, Udumalpet.

2. The District Munsif, Udumalpet.

Copy to:

The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.s.Gunalan , Advocate SR.No. 83766 S.A.No.1259 of 2003 sj A.SK(19/11/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/