Balammal v. V.Israel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.08.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.A.No.1179 of 2006 and M.P.No.1 of 2006 1.Smt.Balammal 2.Shanthi 3.Babu 4.Murthy 5.Nirmal 6.Mala 7.Malini 8.Madhu 9.Manjula ...Appellants (Appellants 2 to 9 are impleaded as per the order dated 27.12.2002 in I.A.No.34 of 2002 as legal heirs of the deceased Thama)

Versus

1.V.Isrel (died) 2.Smt.Nagamani 3.Arul Moses 4.Megarunisha (Respondents 2 to 4 are brought on record as legal representatives of the deceased first respondent vide order dated 21.08.2008 in M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2007)

...Respondents

Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 31.01.2003 passed in A.S. No.24 of 1996 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Chengalpattu at Poonamallee confirming the judgment and decree n O.S.No.1041 of 1984 dated 31.08.1995 passed by District Munsif, Poonamallee.

For Appellant : No Appearance For R.1 : Died For R.2 to R.4 :Mr.D.Senthilkumar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

JUDGMENT

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today. There is no representation on the side of the appellants, today. Even on the previous hearing date i.e., on 19.08.2021, there was no representation on the side of the appellants.

2. However, the learned counsel for the respondents is present. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the appellants are not interested to prosecute this Second Appeal. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sr To

1. The Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Chengalpattu at Poonamallee .

2. The District Munsif, Poonamallee.

3. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

S.A.No.1179 of 2006 BR(CO) CT(20/09/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/