← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/1782/2022granted

Karim v. State Rep By

2022-01-28Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.01.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL.O.P.No.1782 of 2022 Karim ... Petitioner

Versus

The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Pallikonda Police Station, Vellore District.

(Crime No.345 of 2020) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Crime No.345 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner :

Mr.M.Sathish Kumar For Respondent :

Mr.N.S.Suganthan, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) *********

O R D E R

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 7(5) and 20

(2) of Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 r/w Section 328 of IPC in Crime No.345 of 2020, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 06.05.2020 while the respondent was on a regular patrol near the Pallikonda Tolgate, they had found a vehicle Ashok Leyland Dost ran in a rash manner when the vehicle was stopped and checked the respondent had found a banned Tobacco products Hans in small packets of 12 Bags to the tune of 180 kgs valued at Rs.90,000/-, when the co-accused was arrested he had confessed that on the instructions of the petitioner he had transported the Tobacco products. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner illegally transported the Tobacco Products without permission. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Vellore, Vellore District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand only) to the credit of the Registered Advocate Clerk Association, Vellore District within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below.

[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[c] the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

-sd/- 28/01/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.V, VELLORE, VELLORE DISTRICT.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VELLORE DISTRICT.[FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALLIKONDA POLICE STATION, VELLORE DISTRICT.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

5 THE REGISTERED ADVOCATE CLERKS ASSOCIATION, VELLORE DISTRICT.

+1 CC to M/S. M.SATHISH KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.1376 CRL OP.1782/2022 Date :28/01/2022 RW 01/02/2022