Madras High CourtSA/1382/2003dismissed for default

Samikannu v. Chinnammal

2019-10-25Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 25.10.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM S.A.No.1382 of 2003

1. Samikannu 2.Arumugam ... Appellants Vs.

1. Chinnammal

2. Sarasu alias Saroja

3. Kalaiarasi

4. Eswari ... Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree made in the Cross Objection in A.S.No.18 of 2001 dated 29th June 2001 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Salem, preferred against the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.1338 of 1996 dated 31st day of October 2000 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Salem. For Appellants :No appearance For Respondents : M/s.A.Nilapher for M/s.R.Subramani Iyer

JUDGMENT

In the last hearing, i.e., on 22.10.2019, there was no representation for the appellants. Hence, the matter has been posted today (25.10.2019) under the caption, '' for dismissal ''

2. Today also, no representation for the appellants. The learned counsel for the respondents present. The appellant called absent. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.

s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

vv To

1. The First Additional District Judge, Salem.

2. The II Additional District Munsif, Salem.

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

S.A.No.1382 of 2003 BR(CO) SP(30/12/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/