Sarashambal v. Dhandapani Naidu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.02.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A.No.1214 of 2006 and M.P.No.2 of 2006 1.Saradhambal 2.Irusan 3.Ramalingam ...Appellants/Defendants Vs.

1.Dhandapani Naidu 2.Thoppuzhan @ Ravi ...Respondents /Plaintiff /4th Respondent Prayer:

Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree of the Principal Sub Court, Villupuram made in A.S.No.234 of 2003 dated 29.06.2005 that partly allowed the well considered judgment and decree of the 1st Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.1, Ulundurpet passed in O.S.No.259 of 2000 dated 26.06.2002. For Appellants : No appearance.

For Respondents : Mr.T.S.Baskaran for R1 for R2 - No appearance.

JUDGMENT

In this matter, the counsel for the appellants already reported "no instructions". The appellants, on being called and remaining absent, the registry was directed to list the matter on 07.02.2019 under the caption "for dismissal" by printing the names of the appellants in the cause list.

2. Today, when the matter is called, the counsel for R1 present but there is no representation for the appellants. Appellants called. Absent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. In view of the above position, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution with costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Memorandum of Cost Respondent ( ) Costs Stamp for Vakalatnama 10.00 Advocate's Fee on Rupees -- Translation and Printing/Typing charges --- ----- 10.00 ----- Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar bga

1. Principal Sub Judge, Villupuram.

2. Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.1, Ulundurpet.

3. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras. (2 Copies) +1cc to Mr.T.S.Baskaran, Advocate Sr.11027 S.A.No.1214 of 2006 and M.P.No.2 of 2006 ak[co] srg 26/03/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/