Muthu Gounder v. Palani

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.10.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN S.A.No.1302 of 2009 1.Muthu Gounder 2.Senthamarai .. Appellants/Plaintiffs Vs.

1.Palani 2.Venkatachalam 3.Krishnan .. Respondents/Defendants PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree dated 20.07.2009 made in A.S.No.42 of 2008 on the file of the Sub Court, Harur confirming that of the learned District Munsif, Harur dated 12.03.2008 made in O.S.No.21 of 2003.

For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : Ms.Zeenath Begum

J U D G M E N T

(The case has been heard through video conference) When the appeal was taken for hearing on 24.07.2020, there was no representation for the appellant and hence the appeal was directed to be listed after four weeks.

2. Even on 24.08.2020, there was no representation for the appellant and as such the matter was posted today.

3. Today, when the matter is called again there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It shows that the appellant is not interested to proceed the matter further. Hence, this court has no other option except to dismiss the same. Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rpl https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Sub Court, Harur.

2.The District Munsif Court, Harur.

+1cc to Mr.Jeenath Begum, Advocate, S.R.No. 33768 S.A.No.1302 of 2009 AJS(CO) GN(19/11/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/