← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/2245/2022granted

Sundarsan v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-02-02Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02.02.2022

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.2245 of 2022 Sundarsan .. Petitioner Vs.

State represented by ... Respondent The Inspector of Police, R3, Ashok Nagar Police Station, Chennai District.

Crime No.24 of 2022 Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Cr.No.24 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner : M/s. Premakumari For Respondent : Mr. A.Gokulakrishanan Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(This case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 420 of IPC, in Crime Number 24 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is a land broker. It is alleged that the defacto complainant and her husband remitted Rs. 43 lakhs in the petitioner's account during the year 2017 for the purpose of purchasing a land. Thereafter, the petitioner returned only Rs.9,46,000/- and the balance amount has not been repaid by the petitioner. Hence, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint before the Law Enforcing Agency.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner falsely implicated in the case and he has not

committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submits that the petitioner had already repaid the total amount of Rs.68 lakhs to the defacto complainant and he further submitted that the petitioner is a heart patient and also suffering from cardiac arrest. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that there was a monetary transaction dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant from the year 2017 onwards. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering that the petitioner is suffering from heart ailments and to that effect medical reports also affixed, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier, before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Court XVII, Saidapet, Chennai District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

[b] the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police on every Tuesday and Saturday at 10.30.am., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions has been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

[f] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC;

-sd/- 02/02/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE XVII, SAIDAPET, CHENNAI DISTRICT.

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMOE, CHENNAI [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE R3 ASHOK NAGAR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI DISTRICT.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1CC to M/S.PREMAKUMARI Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.1834 CRL OP.2245/2022 Date :02/02/2022 CSK 11/02/2022