Madras High CourtSA/1894/2003dismissed for nonprosecution

Kuppuswamy Naicker(Died) v. Muthammal

2026-06-22Honourable Mr.Justice R.Sakthivel3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL AND CMP NO. 17169 OF 2003 in S.No.1894 of 2003

1. Kuppuswamy Naicker(died)

2. Athiammal

3. Amsavalli

4. Velu

5. Saraswathi

6. Ramachandran

7. Palani

8. Bhoopathi

9. Vasantha @ Vasanthalakshmi ..Appellants in both S.As. Appellants 2 to 9 brought on record as L.Rs' of the deceased sole appellant vide Order of Court dated 25.07.2019 made in CMP.No.1792 of 2008 in S.A.Nos.1894 of 2003 and order of Court dated 24.02.2014 made in M.P.No.1 of 2008 in S.A.No.884 of 2008.

Vs.

1. Muthammal

2. Munuswamy Pillai

3. Narayana Pillai ..Respondents in S.A.No.1894 of 2003 Narayana Pillai .. Respondent in S.A.No.884 of 2008 PRAYER in S.A.No.1894 of 2003 : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated November 27, 1997 made in A.S.No.82 of 1992 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated

August 27, 1992 made in O.S.No.867 of 1987 on thee file of the District Munsif, Gingee.

For Appellants : No Appearance For Respondents : Served . No Appearance PRAYER in S.A.No. 884 of 2008 : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated June 24, 2005 made in A.S.No.63 of 2002 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam, cofirming the Judgment and Decree dated June 21, 2002 made in O.S.No.871 of 1987 on thee file of the District Munsif, Gingee.

For Appellants : No Appearance For Respondent : No Appearance COMMON

JUDGMENT

No representation for the Appellants in both the Appellants.

2. As per the order dated June 15, 2026, the name of the appellants have been shown in the cause list.

3. Despite name being shown in the cause list, none appeared on behalf of the appellants, the appellants are called absent. Hence, these Second Appeals are dismissed for non prosecution. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

22.06.2026 kkd

R.SAKTHIVEL ,J., KKD To

1. The Subordinate Court, Tindivanam.

2. The District Munsif, Gingee.

SA NoS. 1894 of 2003 & 884 OF 2008 AND CMP NO. 17169 OF 2003 22-06-2026