Rajanesh @ Bujili Reddy v. State Through
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.1957 of 2022 Rajanesh @ Bujili Reddy ... Petitioner Vs.
State represented by The Inspector of Police, Hudco Police Station, Krishnagiri District.
Crime No.3 of 2022 ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Cr.No.3 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr. R.Ganesh Kumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
(This case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 25(1)(a) of Arms Act - 1959, in Crime Number 3 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is the petitioner was involved in illegal hunting of rabbit using country made weapon. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner falsely implicated in the case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the investigation almost completed and further submitted that c-accused enlarged on bail and the weapon also seized. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also co-accused enlarged on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No: II at Hosur on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Tuesday at 10.30.a.m., until further orders;
[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[e] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions has been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
[f] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC;
-sd/- 01/02/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, HOSUR.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KRISHNAGIRI [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HUDCO POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1 CC to M/S.R.GANESH KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.1622 CRL OP.1957/2022 Date :01/02/2022 JPA 10/02/2022