← Library
Madras High CourtSA/930/2008dismissed for nonprosecution

Mrs.Jothiammal v. G.A.Sripathi

2022-10-20Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.10.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Second Appeal Nos.930 & 931 of 2008 & MP.Nos.1 & 2 of 2008 1.Mrs.Jothiammal 2.Ms.Sumathi 3.Ms.Jayanthi ... Appellants in both SAs.

Vs.

1.G.A.Sripathi 2.G.A.Prathap Kumar, 3.G.A.Ravichandaran 4.Mrs.S.Mangalagowri 5.Mrs.J.Rajaswari 6.Mrs.V.Vijayalakshmi 7.Mrs.S.Dhanalakshmi 8.Mrs.A.Sathiabhama 9.G.A.Balaji ...respondents in both SAs.

10.The Tahsildar, Cheyyar Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.

11.The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District. ... Respondents 10 & 11 in SA.No.930 of 2008 Prayer:- This second appeal has been filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 20.02.2008 made in A.S.Nos.4 1/4

of 2007 & 21 of 2006 respectively, on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai reversing the judgement and decree dated 27.01.2006 made in O.S.Nos.781 of 1995 & 66 of 2002 respectively, on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Cheyyar(Prayer in both SAs).

SA Nos.930 & 931 of 2008 For Appellants : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.S.Madhavan for R9 R.Siddharth GA(CS) for RR10 & 11 in SA.No.930 of 2008 COMMON JUDGEMENT It is seen from the records that when the matter was taken up for hearing on 14.10.2022, there was no representation for the appellants. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption '' for dismissal'' on 19.10.2022. Today, when the matter is called, none appeared for the appellants.

2. Mr.K.S.Madhavan, the learned counsel for the ninth respondent and Mr.R.Siddharth, learned Government Advocate (CS) for the respondents 10 & 11 are present.

2/4

3.Non appearance on behalf of the appellants would show that they are not interested in prosecuting the cases. Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the second appeals for nonprosecution. 4.Accordingly, the second appeals are dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

20.10.2022 dn To 1.The Subordinate Judge, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai 2.The Principal District Munsif, Cheyyar 3/4

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J., dn Second Appeal Nos.930 & 931 of 2008 20.10.2022 4/4