Madras High CourtSA/558/2006dismissed for nonprosecution

Ettayee Ammal v. S. Rajathi Ammal

2021-06-29Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29.06.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.A.No.558 of 2006

1. Ettayee ammal

2. Palaniammal

3. Vimala

4. Ananda Kumar ...

Appellants/Petitioners

Versus

S. Rajathi Ammal ...

Respondent/Defendent Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 09.09.2005 in A.S. No.61 of 2005 on the file of Principal Subordinate Court, Salem, confirming the judgment and decree dated 25.01.2005 in O.S. No.2117 of 2004 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Salem. For Appellants : No Appearance For Respondent : Ms.Zeenath Begum

JUDGMENT

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today. There is no representation on the side of the appellants, today. Even on the last hearing date i.e., on 27.04.2021, there was no representation on the side of the appellants. However, the learned counsel for the respondent is present. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the appellants are not interested to prosecute this Second Appeal. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsi2 To

1. The Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem.

2. The Principal District Munsif, Salem.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Copy to The Section officer, VR Section, High court, Madras-104 +1cc to Mrs.Zeenath Begum, Advocate SR.No.30347 S.A.No.558 of 2006 RGN (CO) B.VC (06/082021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/