Srinivasa Udyar v. Anandan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 13.11.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM SA.No.643 of 2006 and C.M.P.No.9780 of 2006 and C.M.P.No.1577 of 2008 Mr.Srinivasa Udyar .. Appellant/Plaintiff Vs.

1.Mr.Anandan 2.Mr.Subramanian 3.Mr.Pandian 4.Mrs.Vijayakumari .. Respondents/Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree of the learned Additional Sub-Ordinate Judge, Tindivanam in A.S.No.11 of 1994 on his file and dated 01.10.2002, confirming the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsiff, Gingee in O.S.No.385 of 1989 on his file and dated 22.12.1993.

For Appellant :

Mr.V.Chandrakanthan For Respondents :

No appearance

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant brought to the notice of this Court that the sole appellant died long back. This apart, one of the respondent also passed away during the pendency of the Second Appeal.

2.Thus, the learned counsel for the appellant is unable to secure any instructions from the appellant side, enabling him to get along with the case.

3.Thus, the Second Appeal stands dismissed as abated. If at https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

all, the parties are interested, it is left open to them to reopen the case within a reasonable period of time. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kak To 1.The learned Additional Sub-Ordinate Judge, Tindivanam.

2.The learned District Munsiff, Gingee.

Copy To:- The Section Officer VR Section, High Court Madras.

+1 cc to Mr.V.Chandraskhanthan, Advocate Sr.No.77904 SA.No.643 of 2006 CA(CO) CSL/07.12.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/