K.Palanivel v. The Managing Director,
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI Lok Adalat-I organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee Tuesday, the 07th day of September, 2021 LOK ADALAT AWARD (Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987) Presided over by The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE MALAI SUBRAMANIAN (Retd.) and Member Mr.K. Balasubramanian, District Judge (Retd.,) W.P.No.16016 of 2011 (This writ petition is praying to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to grant the revised rates of house rent allowance to all the petitioners as applicable to Grade I (b) cities and accordingly repay the amount already recovered and continue to pay the same in future.) 1.K.Palanivel 2.M.Subramanian 3.B.Kesavan 4.J.Sasikumar 5.N.Periyasamy 6.M.Kumaravel 7.G.Tamilarasan 8.S.Ravichandran 9.R.Ramesh 10.N.Parthiban 11.K.Sadasivam 12.M.Thirulogachandar 13.P.
Ramakrishnan 14.S.Murugesan 15.V.Manoharan 16.V.Subramani 17.M.Kandasamy 18.D.Raja 19.K.Pandiyan 20.M.Abdul Muheem 21.D.Venkatesan 22.P.Palanivel 23.P.Asokan 24.S.Thamaraikannan 25.A.Karunakaran 26.P.D.Baskar 27.A.Thiagarajan 28.M.Loganathan 29.C.
30.K.Duraisamy 31.R.P.Ravichandhran 32.R.Thangaraju 33.B.Ganesh Kumar 34.N.Elango 35.K.Chandrasekar 36.S.Raja 37.N.Kalaivanan 38.K.Kathirvel 39.P.Mahendran 40.R.Shanmugam 41.P.Jayaprakash 42.M.Shajahan 43.A.R.Balraj 44.N.Hariprakash 45.V.Shanthi 46.S.Jayakumar 47.R.Murali 48.M.Ramesh Babu 49.M.Suresh Babu 50.M.Manjuladevi 51.N.Balasubramanian 52.S.M.Khadarmohideen 53.P.Shanmuganathsing 54.N.Sumathy 55.K.Aruna 56.M.Shanmugavadivu 57.P.Senthil 58.P.Mohan 59.R.Chitra 60.S.Selvakumar 61.V.Sakthivelu 62.M.Pandiyan 63.A.Chezhiyan 64.S.Kulanthasami 65.S.Vivekanandan 66.M.Mahendiran 67.D.Murugesan 68.P.Kanthimathi 69.P.Soundappan 70.P.Subramanian 71.M.Raja 72.A.Prabhakaran ....
Petitioners
Vs.
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., 12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem - 7, Salem District.
...
Respondent This case came up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Both the parties are present. Petitioner Nos.22 & 31 and D.Raghu, the learned counsel for the respondent are present in the Lok Adalat. After mutual discussion, negotiation, mediation and conciliation between both parties, they arrived at a compromise to settle the matter as follows: TERMS OF SETTLEMENT The petitioners have filed writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to grant the revised rates of house rent allowance to all the petitioners as applicable to Grade I (b) cities. Pending finality of the writ petition, petitioners No.22 Thiru.P.Palanivel and petitioner No.31.Thiru.
R.P.Ravichandhran both did not want to press their request further. 2.Accordingly, in so far as the petitioner Nos.22 & 31 are concerned, the writ petition stands disposed of as not pressed. No costs. Consequently,connected miscellaneous petition, if any, is closed. P.Palanivel (Petitioner No.22) R.P.Ravichandhran (Petitioner No.31)
The Management, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Limited, 12, Ramakrishna Salai, Salem - 7.
Counsel for the Respondent Judge Member To:The parties/Advocate concerned Copy to:
1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., 12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem - 7, Salem District..
2.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai. 3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras. 4.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras.+2 copies adl/sms
MALAI SUBRAMANIAN, J. (Retd.) adl/sms W.P.No.16016 of 2011 07.09.2021