Kolandasamy Gounder v. Gopalan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.10.2023

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD S.A.No. 786 of 2006 and MP.Nos.1 to 14 of 2008 and MP.No.1 of 2006

1. Kolandasamy Gounder

2. Periyasamy Gounder

3. Muthusami Gounder

4. Pongiappan

5. Subana Gounder

6. Ramasamy Gounder

7. Ramalingam

8. Sivalingam

9. Palanisamy

10. Periyasamy

11. Palanisamy Gounder

12. Parvatham

13. K.Paramasivam

14. Gopalakrishnan

15. Thangavel ... Appellants Vs.

1. Gopalan

2. Jothimani

3. R.S.Paramasivam

4. V. Sachinandandam

5. M.Manickam

6. Singaram

7. Loganathan

8. Ramasamy

9. R.Subbaiyan

10. Executive Officer Arulmigu Magudeswaran Vedanarayanaperumal Temple, Kodumudi Erode Taluk.

11. Govindammal

12. Kathirvel

13. Loganathan

14. Radhakrishnan

15. Mahalingam

16. Annakodi

17. Saraswathi

18. Samiathal

19. Krishnaveni

20. Manickam

21. Arukani

22. Mallika

23. Subbulakshmi

24. Minor Saranya

25. Angamuthu

26. Lakshmi

27. Maragatham

28. Bagiyam

29. Chitra

30. Muthusamy Gounder

31. Nachiappa Gounder

32. Vadivel

33. Ramana Gounder @ Ramasami Gounder

34. Deivasigamani

35. Pongianna Gounder

36. Pushpana Gounder

37. Shanmugam

38. Akilamani

39. Lakshmi

40. Vadivel @ Saminathan

41. Saminathan

42. Ramayeeammal

43. Pongiammal

44. Arukkani

45. Saraswathi

46. Dhandapani

47. Pappathi

48. Ravi

49. Lakshmanan

50. Velayammal

51. Pongianna Gounder

52. Krishnamurthy

53. Kaliappa Gounder ... Respondents Prayer:- This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgement and decree of the Principal District Judge Court at Erode dated 17.11.2005 in A.S.No.142 of 2002, confirming the judgment and decree of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Court at Kodumudi, dated 16.08.2001 in O.S.No.367 of 1996. For Appellants : M/s.T.N.Gayathri for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates For Respondents : M/s.Zeenath Begum for R1 to R3, R5, R6, R8, R15, R19, R21, R44 & R46 Mr.V.S.Kesavan for R30, R33 to R35, R37 to R41, R43 to R45 & R51

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that many respondents have died and she has also not received any instructions from the parties. Further, the learned counsel submitted that the Second Appeal may be dismissed as abated.

2. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellants, the Second Appeal stands dismissed as abated with liberty to reopen the same when need arises. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

Index : No 09.10.2023 Internet : Yes (2/2) dpq

J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

dpq To

1. The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court Kodumudi,

2. The Principal District Court Erode S.A.No. 786 of 2006 09.10.2023