Umapathy, v. Sankari,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 01.10.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.A. No.858 of 2007 Umpathy ...Plaintiff/Appellant/Appellant Vs 1.Sankari 2.Jothi 3.Suguna 4.Selvi 5.Yesodha ...Defendants/Respondents/Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C. against the judgment and decree dated 27.06.2006 in A.S.No.121 of 2005 on the file of the Sub Court at Ranipet confirming the judgment and decree dated 11.08.2004 in O.S.No.71 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ranipet.

For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.A.Seshan For Respondents 3 to 5 : No appearance

JUDGMENT

The matter is listed under the caption for dismissal, today. There is no representation on the side of the Appellant. However, the learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 is present. Even on the earlier occasion, i.e., on 27.09.2019, there was no representation on the side of the Appellant. It can now be inferred that the Appellant is not interested in prosecuting this Second Appeal. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Insp cell) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

nl To

1. The Sub Court at Ranipet

2. The District Munsif Court, Ranipet.

Copy to: The Section Officer VR section, High Court, Madras-104 S.A. No.858 of 2007 PVS(CO) CB(19/11/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/