Madras High CourtSA/880/2006dismissed as abated

Gopal Reddy, v. Arulmighu Pidari Amman Temple,

2021-08-18Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18.08.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.A. No.880 of 2006 and M.P.No.1 of 2006 Gopal Reddy .... Appellant

Versus

Arulmighy Pidari Amman Temple Thagarakuppam Village, rep by 1.M.Subramani 2.M.Kanthasamy ... Respondents Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure code, against the decree and judgment passed in A.S. No.60 of 2005 dated 28.12.2005on the file of learned Subordinate Judge, Ranipet, Vellore District, reversing the judgment and decree dated 17.12.2003 in O.S.No.111 of 1990 on the file of District Munsif, Sholinghur.

For Appellant :

Mr.T.R.Rajaraman Senior Counsel for Mr.Bharath Gowtham For 1st Respondent :

Ms.K.Janani for Mr.N.S.Sivakumar For 2nd Respondent :

Not ready in notice

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the sole appellant died long back.

2. Since steps have not been taken to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased appellant till date, the second appeal stands dismissed as abated. No costs. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) // True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sr To 1.The Subordinate Judge, Ranipet 2.The District Munsif, Sholinghur.

S.A.No.880 of 2006 RGN(CO) SU(06/09/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/