Mallika, v. K.Veeramuthu,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.07.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.A.No.898 of 2006 Mallika ...Appellant/ Palintiff vs.

K.Veeramuthu

...Respondent/ Defendant

Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Award of the Learned Additional Sub Judge, Salem in A.S.No.58 of 2005 dated 25.10.2005 reversing the judgment and decree of the learned Principal District Munsif of Salem in O.S.No.453 of 2004 dated 5.11.2004. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.S.Manohar

JUDGMENT

This Court by its earlier order dated 27.04.2021 recorded the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Appellant that he had reported "no instructions" in this matter. Thereafter, this Court directed the Registry to print the name of the Appellant in the cause list and list the matter on 04.06.2021. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, once again there is no representation on the side of the Appellant. The Second Appeal is of the year 2006. It can now be inferred that the Appellant is not interested in prosecuting the Second Appeal. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Additional Sub Judge, Salem.

2.The Principal District Munsif of Salem.

3. The Section Officer VR Section, High Court Madras.

S.A.No.898 of 2006 KK(CO) GN(02/08/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/