Madras High CourtSA/907/2007dismissed for nonprosecution

Arulmigu Chenraya Perumal v. Thangammal

2019-10-24Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.10.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.A. No.907 of 2007 Arulmigu Chenraya Perumal Temple Mecheri, rep. by its Hereditary Trustee V.Sudarsanan ...

Appellant Vs

1. Thangammal

2. Kanjana

3. Sellam

4. Kanaka ...

Respondents Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure as against the Judgment and decree dated 12.09.2006 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Mettur in A.S. No.73 of 2005 confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 16.02.2005 passed by the learned District Munsif, Mettur in O.S. No.91 of 2002.

For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : M/s.S.Chandra Bose for 1 to 4

JUDGMENT

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today. Earlier, this Court by order dated 17.09.2019 has directed the Registry to print the name of the appellant on the next hearing date 25.09.2019 and even on the last occasion i.e. on 25.09.2019, there was no representation on the side of the appellant. However, the learned counsel for the respondents is present. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the Second Appeal. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

vsi2 To

1. The Subordinate Judge, Mettur.

2. The learned District Munsif, Mettur.

Copy to The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Chennai.

S.A. No.907 of 2007 rr (CO) A.SK(27/11/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/