Dr. P Senthilkumar v. S.P. Punitha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.04.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and MP.No.1 of 2012 & MP.No.1 of 2011 and CMP.No.18237 of 2017 CMA.No.3102 of 2012 Dr.P.Senthilkumar ... Appellant Vs.

S.P.Punitha ... Respondent Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 against the Judgment and Decree dated 21.03.2011 made in FCOP.No.212 of 2007 on the file of Family Court, Salem. Page No.1/4

A.S.No.391 of 2011 Dr.P.Senthilkumar ... Appellant Vs.

1. S.P.Punitha

2. V.Palanivel

3. Dhanalakshmi

4. The Assistant Registering Authority, Regional Transport Office, Rasipuram, Pachal P.O Andagalur Gate, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District.

5. The Sub Registrar, Rasipuram P.O, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District.

6. The District Registrar, Namakkal Town, Namakkal Taluk and District.

7. The Assistant Registrar, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, O & M, Rasipuram Town, Namakkal District.

8. The Commissioner, Rasipuram Municipality, Rasipuram Town, Namakkal District.

... Respondents Prayer: First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying to set aside the judgment and decree dated 21.03.2011 made in O.S.No.21 of 2008 on the file of Family Court, Salem in so far as against the plaintiff/appellant is concerned.

Page No.2/4

For Appellant in both Appeals : Mr.J.Ramakrishnan For Respondent in CMA : Mr.T.Fennwalter Associates For Respondents in AS : Mr.T.Fennwalter Associates for R1 ***** C O M M O N J U D G M E N T [Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J] Mr.J.Ramakrishnan, learned counsel for the appellant in both the appeals would submit that despite notices having been sent, his client is not responded. Therefore, he is reporting no instructions. No other counsel has entered appearance. Hence, both the Appeals are dismissed for nonprosecution. Mr.J.Ramakrishnan is required to intimate the appellant of the dismissal of these appeals by RPAD. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. (R.S.M.J.,) (C.K.J.,) 04.04.2024 Index : No Internet : Yes Speaking order: Yes kmi Page No.3/4

R.SUBRAMANIAN , J.

and C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

kmi To

1. The Family Court, Salem.

2. The Section Officer, VR Section High Court, Madras.

04.04.2024 Page No.4/4