E.Srinivasan v. The Revenue Divisional Officer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.04.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.No.9295 of 2017 E. Srinivasan ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai District.
2. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Brammadesam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.
... Respondents This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to release the Tractor with Trailer bearing Registration No. TN 25 BZ 6948 which was seized by the 2nd respondent on 08.04.2017 and thereby consider the representation dated 09.04.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Punniakoti For Respondents : Mr.M.Elumalai.
Government Advocate
O R D E R
Mr.M.Elumalai, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 09.04.2017 for release of Tractor with Trailer bearing Registration No.TN 25 BZ 6948.
3. It is stated that the above vehicle, Tractor with trailor was seized by the 2nd respondent on 08.04.2017 on the allegation that the said vehicle was indulged in transporting sand without any valid bill or permission of the Government in violation of certain provisions under the Tamil Nadu Minor
Mineral Concession Rules, 1959. According to the petitioner, there was no such violation and on the other hand, it was used only for the personal consumption of the petitioner. Needless to say that it is for the authority to consider such claim of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders and therefore, this Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the claim made by the petitioner. However, considering the fact that the vehicle was seized on 08.04.2017 and the same is kept idle thereby exposing it to sun and rain, which undoubtedly would diminish its value, this Court is of the view that the following order will protect the interest of both parties: a) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) before the 1st respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order .
b) The petitioner shall appear in person and produce all the relevant documents proving the ownership of the vehicle, Tractor with Trailer for verification of the authority in proof of such ownership.
(c) On receipt of payment as stated supra and also on being satisfied with the ownership of the vehicle, Tractor with Trailer, the respondents shall release the same forthwith.
(d) The petitioner shall not use the said vehicle, tractor with trailer for any unlawful purpose and also shall not alienate the same during the pendency of the proceedings.
(e) It is open to the 1st respondent to initiate proceedings in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(f) If no such order is passed within the time stipulated therein, the amount so paid by the petitioner shall be refunded to the petitioner.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. -s/dAssistant Registrar(CSIV) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar vsi/rkp
To
1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai District.
2. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Brammadesam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.
+1 cc to M/s.G.Punniyakotti Advocate sr 23187/17 W.P.No.9295 of 2017 br(co) aa19/04/2017