Venugopal v. Krishnaveni

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.06.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA Second Appeal No.797 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Venugopal ...Appellant/3rd Defendant Vs.

1.Krishnaveni 2.Sekar ..Respondents 1 & 2/Plaintiff 1 & 2 3.Anbazhagan (The 3rd Respondent given up as he was already set exparte in the Trial Court) ..3rd Respondent/1st Defendant 4.Varadhammal 5.P.Anjali Devi 6.Sarala 7.Nandhakumar 8.P.Prabu 9.P.Paramesvari 10.Durga Ammal 11.Parthasarathy 12.Vijayammal

...Respondents

Prayer:- The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 11.07.2006 made in A.S.No.36 of 1996 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu, Kancheepuram District, confirming the Judgement and Decree dated 04.09.1996 made in O.S.No.25 of 1986 on the file of the District Munsif, Chengalpattu.

For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents: Mr.K.Hariharan for R1 Mr.B.Rajkumar Ashok Singh for R5 to 9 No Appearance for R2 & R4 served R3- given up R10 to 12 - exparte vide order dt.22.04.2021

J U D G M E N T

(The case has been heard through video conference) On the earlier occasion when the matter was listed, it was observed by this Court that the appellant had been served on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

18.05.2021, however, there is no representation on his behalf either through counsel or in person. Therefore, the matter was ordered to be listed today under the caption "for dismissal." Once again, there is no representation on behalf of the sole appellant. Hence, the Second Appeal stands dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

-s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar kas To:

1.The Subordinate Judge Chengalpattu Kancheepuram District 2.The District Munsif Chengalpattu +1 CC to Mr.K.Hariharan, Advocate sr 29761.

S.A.No.797 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 BS(CO) SP(22/07/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/