Kesavan v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.02.2022

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE Criminal Revision Case No.94 of 2022 Mr.Kesavan S/o.Subramani, ... Petitioner

Versus

The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Bargur Police Station, Krishnagiri District ... Respondent Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 r/w 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the Order passed in Crl.M.P.No.1704 of 2020 dated 24.08.2020 on the file before the Learned Principle Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri and to direct the Court below to Return the Property in Crime No.572 of 2020. For Petitioner :

Mr.M.P.Saravanan For Respondent :

Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This Revision is preferred against an order passed in Crl.M.P.No.1704 of 2021 dated 24.08.2020 by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Krihnagiri rejecting the petitioner's plea for return of vehicle under sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C. The vehicle involved is AGROLUX-50 DEUTZ-FAHR Tractor with Trailor bearing Reg No.TN-24-AR-5627. The offence is that this vehicle was involved in illegal transportation of M Sand. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle and that he is no way connected with the alleged offence.

3.Mr.C.A.J.Selvam, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that no confiscation proceedings have been initiated and that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner.

4.After hearing both sides, this Court chooses to allow this petition and accordingly directs the Learned Principal Sessions Judge, Krihnagiri to return the AGROLUX-50 DEUTZ-FAHR Tractor with Trailor bearing No.TN-24-AR-5627, to the petitioner, on the following conditions:- (i)The petitioner shall produce the original RC Book of the vehicle and other relevant records to prove his ownership and the Learned Principal Sessions Judge, Krihnagiri on perusal of the RC book and other records, retaining the Xerox copy of the same, shall return the original documents to the petitioner with a view to use the vehicle;

(ii)The petitioner shall not alter or alienate the vehicle in any manner till confiscation proceedings is over; (iii)The petitioner shall also give an undertaking that he will not use the vehicle for any illegal activities in future and also to produce the vehicle as and when required by the respondent or the Court below as well as by the District Collector of the District or authorized officer in that behalf by the Government;

(iv)The petitioner shall participate in the confiscation proceedings, if any initiated, and shall produce the vehicle, before the confiscation authority. This order is subjected to the confiscation proceedings.

5.With the above directions, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed by setting aside the order dated 24.08.2020 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1704 of 2021 by the Learned Principal Sessions Judge, Krihnagiri.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Tsg To

1. Learned Principal Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri, 2.The Inspector of Police, Bargur Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.M.P.Saravanan, Advocate, S.R.No.10557 Crl.R.C.No.94 of 2022 KG(CO) SB(09/03/2022)