Rajagopal Iyer v. Athikesavan

S.A.No.908 of 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.04.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.No. 908 of 2009 Rajagopal Iyer ... Appellant Vs.

Athikesavan ... Respondent Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC against the decree and judgment dated 30.03.2007 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Villupuram, in A.S. No.15 of 2006 reversing the decree and judgment dated 07.12.2005 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam, in O.S. No.156 of 2000.

For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr. R. Balakrishnan https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.A.No.908 of 2009 R. HEMALATHA bga

JUDGMENT

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. A perusal of the records shows that the sole appellant died even before 10.03.2021. Till date no steps have been taken by the appellant to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant.

2. In view of the same, this second appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.

17.04.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking order bga To

1. The Principal District Judge, Villupuram.

2. The Additional Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam.

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras. S.A.No. 908 of 2009 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis