Annamalai v. Perumal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.12.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. PONGIAPPAN S.A.NOS.1172 AND 1173 OF 2010 1.Annamalai 2.Chinnapaiyan .. Appellants in both S.As.

Vs Perumal .. Respondent in both S.As.

Common Prayer:

The Second Appeals are filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree dated 23.03.2010 in A.S.Nos.9 and 10 of 2007, respectively, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Arni, confirming the judgment and decree dated 13.12.2006 in O.S.Nos.624 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Polur and O.S.No.17/1991 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Arani.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.Suresh COMMON JUDGMENT On 17.12.2021, when these appeals were came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellants reported "No instructions" from the appellants. He has also filed a memo to that effect. Hence, the Registry was directed to print the name of the appellants in the cause-list and to list these matters under the caption 'For Dismissal' on 22.12.2021. Accordingly, these cases were listed today under the caption 'For dismissal'.

2. Even today (22.12.2021), though the names of the appellants are printed in the cause-list, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants either in person or https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

through counsel. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent is present.

3. In view of the above, these Second Appeals are dismissed for default. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rsi To

1. The Subordinate Judge, Arni.

2. The District Munsif, Polur.

3. The District Munsif, Arani.

4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

S.A.Nos.1172 and 1173 of 2010 NRL(CO) PM/11/01/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/