Mi.Kumar v. Tmt Saroja

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.08.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.A. No.2136 of 2004 1.M.I.Kumar (Died) 2.M.K.Janaki 3.M.K.Ramachandran 4.Padmavathy 5.Radha 6.Ramani ...Appellants (Appellants 2 to 6 brought on record as LRs of the first Appellant vide order of this Court dated 25.03.2008 made in CMP.No.344 of in S.A.No.2136/2004) Vs 1.Saroja 2.Palaniammal 3.Meenakshi 4.M.Umapathy 5.Meenakshi 6.M.Selvaraj

...Respondents

PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C. against the Judgment and Decree dated 11.08.2003 made in A.S.No.389 of 1993 by the VIth Additional City Civil Court, Chennai reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 19.08.1992 made in O.S.No.8620 of 1982 by the VIIth Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai For Appellants : Mr.B.Mothilal Jain For Respondent 6 : Mr.J.R.K.Bhavanathan For Respondents 1 to 5 : Not ready in notice

JUDGMENT

A memo dated 10.08.2021 has been filed by the learned counsel for the Appellants stating that the suit schedule property has been acquired by the Government of India for Chennai Metro Rail Project. He has also stated in the said memo that the Appellants and the respondents have vacated the suit https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

schedule property and delivered possession to Chennai Metro Rail Limited as early as on 28.12.2011 and therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this second appeal. The said memo is recorded.

After recording the said memo, this second appeal is closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar nl To

1. The VIth Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.

2. The VIIth Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.

Copy to The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Chennai.

S.A. No.2136 of 2004 PP[co] NSK 24/09/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/