← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/1337/2026dismissed

Vijaya Kumar v. The State Rep By, The Sub-Inspector Of Police

2026-01-22Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.1337 of 2026 Vijaya Kumar ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State rep. by, The Sub- Inspector of Police Station, Tirupattur Taluk Police Station, Tirupattur District.

(Crime No.326 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioner/accused in Crime No.326 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) :

Mr. R. Parthiban For Respondent(s) :

Mr. A. Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 07.12.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 329(4), 296(b), 115(2),76,351(2) of BNS in Crime No.326 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

1/4

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and attempted to commit sexually assault on her and abused her and attacked her indiscriminately and also threatened with dire consequences. It is alleged that hearing the alarming noise of the victim neighbours residing in the same locality rescued her. Hence, this case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that due to previous enmity a false case has been registered against the petitioner and he is in judicial custody from 07.12.2025. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and sought for bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent while opposing the bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner is having nine previous cases Hence, opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 2/4

5.Considering the facts, gravity of offence and there are nine previous cases pending against the petitioner and if the petitioner is released on bail he will attempt to tamper the evidence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6.Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 22.01.2026 smn To

1. The Sub- Inspector of Police Station, Tirupattur Taluk Police Station, Tirupattur District.

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras 3/4

K. RAJASEKAR, J.

smn CRL OP NO.1337 of 2026 22.01.2026 4/4